Impacts of holistic planned grazing with bison compared to continuous grazing with cattle in South Dakota shortgrass prairie

Share This Post


Journal: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Publication Date: 07/2019

Summary: We assess holistic planned grazing outcomes in shortgrass prairie of the Northern Great Plains of North America. We compared key ecosystem functions on the ranch managed using adaptive multi-paddocks (AMP) grazing by bison with those on neighboring ranch paddocks managed using set stocked light continuous (LCG) and heavy continuous grazing (HCG) grazed by cattle. Sites on the neighboring ranches in each grazing category were paired for sampling by soil type and landscape position. In all paddocks, management practices had been constant for more than a decade. Positive results with AMP grazing include increased fine litter cover (P <  0.05), improved water infiltration (P <  0.06), two to three times the available forage biomass (P <  0.001), improved plant composition (P <  0.05), decrease in invasive plants (P <  0.05), and decrease in bare ground (P <  0.05). Higher infiltration occurred with AMP on soils having higher permeability but not on soils having a high clay content. Differences were greatest between AMP and HCG management with LCG being intermediate. Counterintuitively, herbaceous biomass in LCG was less than that of the more heavily stocked HCG (P <  0.05). This was due to decades of heavy continuous grazing resulting in HCG being dominated by invasive herbaceous plants of no forage value in contrast to LCG paddocks that had a greater proportion of palatable forages. The HCG paddocks were dominated by unpalatable invasive plants that were avoided by cattle. Soil carbon stocks increased under the AMP grazing but not on all soils. Total carbon stocks (TC), summing organic carbon and inorganic carbon, were not different between the AMP and LCG grazing strategies (P >  0.63) but both had higher TC values across all soils than HCG (P <  0.001). There were no differences in TC among grazing treatments on the different soils (P >  0.46) except on the Norrest silty clay loam soil that had the highest permeability. On this soil there were differences between AMP and HCG (P < 0.0001) and LCG and HCG (P <  0.0001). There were significantly lower TC levels at all soil depths with HCG than with AMP and LCG (P <  0.05). Using holistic planned grazing protocols with AMP grazing effectively limited overstocking and overgrazing by adjusting animal numbers to match available forage amounts and grazing for short periods followed by adequate recovery after grazing. This study indicated ecological improvements by AMP grazing on the 777 Bison Ranch compared to HCG pastures is contributing to improvements in this semi-arid short grass ecosystem.

Key Takeaways

Multi-paddock grazing involves moving livestock from pasture to pasture to allow for the pastures to recover between grazing periods. This approach is more sustainable and improves amount of available forage, increases water influx, improves soil composition, and decreases invasive plant species when compared to traditional continuous grazing practices. More carbon is also sequestered from the atmosphere in multi-paddock grazing than heavy continued grazing.

How Can Livestock Grazing Practices Impact Sustainability And Soil Health?

Share This Post

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get Fun Carnivore Updates and inspirations

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

More To Explore

Meat and mental health: A meta-analysis of meat consumption, depression, and anxiety

URL: Journal: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition Publication Date: 10/2021 Summary: In this meta-analysis, we examined the quantitative relation between meat consumption or avoidance, depression, and anxiety. in June 2020, we searched five online databases for primary studies examining differences in depression and anxiety between meat abstainers and meat consumers that offered a

Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

URL: Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine Publication Date: 10/2019 Summary: Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence. Key Takeaways Restricting meat from the diet does not have positive effects on cardiometabolic disease or cancer mortality and incidence. There are

Do You Want To Achieve your Optimal Health?

Join us for a free 30-date trial. Cancel Anytime.