Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters

Share This Post

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912419300525?via%3Dihub

Journal: Global Food Security

Publication Date: 10/2019

Summary: Globally, two billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, 151 million children under five suffer from stunting, and millions more have impaired cognitive development related to poor nutrition. This is partly due to insufficient consumption of animal-sourced foods (ASF), which supply multiple bioavailable nutrients that are lacking in the cereal-based diets of the poor. Yet, reports like the one recently published by the EAT-Lancet Commission, solely focus on the threat of ASF consumption on sustainability and human health, overestimate and ignore the tremendous variability in the environmental impact of livestock production, and fail to adequately include the experience of marginalized women and children in low- and middle-income countries whose diets regularly lack the necessary nutrients. Yet animal-source foods have been described by the World HealthOrganization as the best source of high-quality nutrient-rich food for children aged 6–23 months. Livestock and ASF are vital to sustainability as they play a critical role in improving nutrition, reducing poverty, improving gender equity, improving livelihoods, increasing food security, and improving health. The nutritional needs of the world’s poor, particularly women and children, must be considered in sustainability debates.

Key Takeaways

2 billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, which results in poor physical and cognitive development. Animal sourced foods are have been named the best high quality nutrient rich foods for developing infants, yet the EAT Lancet Commission continues to focus animal sourced foods as an environmental and health threat.

What's The Deal With EAT-Lancet Calling Animal Foods Threatening To Health And Sustainability?

Share This Post

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get Fun Carnivore Updates and inspirations

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

More To Explore

Meat and mental health: A meta-analysis of meat consumption, depression, and anxiety

URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2021.1974336 Journal: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition Publication Date: 10/2021 Summary: In this meta-analysis, we examined the quantitative relation between meat consumption or avoidance, depression, and anxiety. in June 2020, we searched five online databases for primary studies examining differences in depression and anxiety between meat abstainers and meat consumers that offered a

Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

URL: https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2752326/effect-lower-versus-higher-red-meat-intake-cardiometabolic-cancer-outcomes Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine Publication Date: 10/2019 Summary: Low- to very-low-certainty evidence suggests that diets restricted in red meat may have little or no effect on major cardiometabolic outcomes and cancer mortality and incidence. Key Takeaways Restricting meat from the diet does not have positive effects on cardiometabolic disease or cancer mortality and incidence. There are

Do You Want To Achieve your Optimal Health?

Join us for a free 30-date trial. Cancel Anytime.